
Ascension of the Prophet (on horse-back) surrounded by angels
ca. 1800
Color and gold on paper
H: 61.5 W: 42.5 cm
possibly Delhi, India
Gift of Professor Alban G. Widgery of Winchester, Virginia
via Tyler Green's Modern Art Notes, 1/14/06:
Richard on portrayals of Muhammad
In today's Washington Post, Paul Richard offers an excellent piece about the history of portrayals of Muhammad.
Several examples are in Washington collections, but, "For reasons that
include "cultural sensitivity," and today's bloody news, none of these
old paintings is currently on view [at the Smithsonian]," Richard
writes.
Ah, but they are on the web. (Naturally the WP website has buried
Richard's story, the only important visual arts story that's been in
the Post in eons. And they could have found these links in under five
minutes.)
The Prophet enthroned and the four orthodox Caliphs from a Shahnama (Book of kings) by Firdawsi
early 14th century
Il-Khanid dynasty
Color, gold, black, and silver on paper
H: 9.8
W: 11.5
cm
Iran
via The Washington Post [excerpt]:
In Art Museums, Portraits Illuminate A Religious Taboo
By Paul Richard
Special to The Washington Post
Tuesday, February 14, 2006; C01
All depictions of Muhammad -- or so we hear daily -- are now and
have always been forbidden in Islam. Art's history disputes this. True,
that strict taboo today is honored now by almost all Muslims, but old
paintings of the prophet -- finely brushed expensive ones, made
carefully and piously by Muslims and for them -- are well known to most
curators of Islamic art.
There are numerous examples in public institutions in Istanbul, Vienna, Edinburgh, London, Dublin, Los Angeles and New York.
Four
are here in Washington in the Smithsonian Institution on the Mall.
Three are in the Freer Gallery of Art. The fourth is next door in the
Freer's sister museum, the Arthur M. Sackler Gallery.
These
portrayals of Muhammad are not big or new or common. Most were made for
the elite. And most were bound in books. These were lavish volumes that
were political in purpose, and were designed to celebrate and dignify
self-promoting rulers. What their paintings show is this: Once upon a
time -- in the era of the caliphs and the sultans and the shahs, when
the faithful felt triumphant, and courtly learning blossomed -- the
prophet did appear in great Islamic art.
Old portrayals
of Muhammad come from Sunni lands and Shia ones, from the Turkey of the
Ottomans, the India of the Mughals, from Uzbekistan, Afghanistan, Syria
and Iran. The oldest that survive were painted circa 1300. The newest
were produced about 200 years ago.
Three such pictures, from
Turkey, Afghanistan and Uzbekistan, are in the collection of the
Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York.
"Contrary to widespread
assumptions today," says a statement issued by that museum's Islamic
specialists, "the traditional arts of Islam, whether Sunni or Shiite,
often did reverently depict the prophet, as abundantly attested by
manuscript illuminations ranging in time from the 13th to the 18th
century, and in space from Turkey to Bengal. Pictorial representations
of the prophet remain accepted by many Shiites to this day, although
they have been generally frowned upon by most Sunnis since about the
18th century."
"Of course such depictions exist," says Sayyid
Syeed, secretary general of the Islamic Society of North America. "What
is important to remember is that they were never widely available. Had
they been, the common people surely would have resented them. But they
were made for powerful dynasties, and no one could take them to task.
"Today the consensus is strong. From Morocco to Indonesia, our tradition prohibits such images."
Those
rough cartoons from Denmark were intended to enrage. They do what they
set out to do. Published in a bunch, they disrespect the faith. The
paintings of the prophet found in grand museums aren't like that at all.
They
were once imperial luxuries. The rulers who commissioned them were
attempting to ally themselves with God-approved, courageous figures of
the past.
The paintings of the prophet were not made for walls. They stayed in costly bindings. Sunlight hasn't dimmed them. [read on...]