Here's
the good news: Women have become so politically powerful that even the
anti-feminist right wing -- the folks with a headlock on the Republican
Party -- are trying to appease the gender gap with a first-ever female
vice president. We owe this to women -- and to many men too -- who have
picketed, gone on hunger strikes or confronted violence at the polls so
women can vote. We owe it to
Shirley Chisholm, who first took the
"white-male-only" sign off the White House, and to
Hillary Rodham
Clinton, who hung in there through ridicule and misogyny to win 18
million votes.
But here is even better news: It won't work. This isn't the first time
a boss has picked an unqualified woman just because she agrees with him
and opposes everything most other women want and need. Feminism has
never been about getting a job for one woman. It's about making life
more fair for women everywhere. It's not about a piece of the existing
pie; there are too many of us for that. It's about baking a new pie.
Selecting
Sarah Palin, who was touted all summer by
Rush Limbaugh, is
no way to attract most women, including die-hard Clinton supporters.
Palin shares nothing but a chromosome with Clinton. Her down-home,
divisive and deceptive speech did nothing to cosmeticize a Republican
convention that has more than twice as many male delegates as female, a
presidential candidate who is owned and operated by the right wing and
a platform that opposes pretty much everything Clinton's candidacy
stood for -- and that
Barack Obama's still does. To vote in protest for
McCain/Palin would be like saying, "Somebody stole my shoes, so I'll
amputate my legs."
This is not to beat up on Palin. I defend her right to be wrong, even
on issues that matter most to me. I regret that people say she can't do
the job because she has children in need of care, especially if they
wouldn't say the same about a father. I get no pleasure from imagining
her in the spotlight on national and foreign policy issues about which
she has zero background, with one month to learn to compete with
Sen.
Joe Biden's 37 years' experience.
Palin has been honest about what she doesn't know. When asked last
month about the vice presidency, she said, "I still can't answer that
question until someone answers for me: What is it exactly that the VP
does every day?" When asked about Iraq, she said, "I haven't really
focused much on the war in Iraq."
She was elected governor largely because the incumbent was unpopular,
and she's won over Alaskans mostly by using unprecedented oil wealth to
give a $1,200 rebate to every resident. Now she is being praised by
McCain's campaign as a tax cutter, despite the fact that Alaska has no
state income or sales tax. Perhaps McCain has opposed affirmative
action for so long that he doesn't know it's about inviting more people
to meet standards, not lowering them. Or perhaps McCain is following
the Bush administration habit, as in the Justice Department, of putting
a job candidate's views on "God, guns and gays" ahead of competence.
The difference is that McCain is filling a job one 72-year-old
heartbeat away from the presidency.
So let's be clear: The culprit is John McCain. He may have chosen Palin
out of change-envy, or a belief that women can't tell the difference
between form and content, but the main motive was to please right-wing
ideologues; the same ones who nixed anyone who is now or ever has been
a supporter of reproductive freedom. If that were not the case, McCain
could have chosen a woman who knows what a vice president does and who
has thought about Iraq; someone like Texas Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison or
Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine. McCain could have taken a baby step away
from right-wing patriarchs who determine his actions, right down to
opposing the Violence Against Women Act.
Palin's value to those patriarchs is clear: She opposes just about
every issue that women support by a majority or plurality. She believes
that creationism should be taught in public schools but disbelieves
global warming; she opposes gun control but supports government control
of women's wombs; she opposes stem cell research but approves
"abstinence-only" programs, which increase unwanted births, sexually
transmitted diseases and abortions; she tried to use taxpayers'
millions for a state program to shoot wolves from the air but didn't
spend enough money to fix a state school system with the lowest
high-school graduation rate in the nation; she runs with a candidate
who opposes the
Fair Pay Act but supports $500 million in subsidies for
a natural gas pipeline across Alaska; she supports drilling in the
Arctic National Wildlife Reserve, though even McCain has opted for the
lesser evil of offshore drilling. She is
Phyllis Schlafly, only younger.
I don't doubt her sincerity. As a lifetime member of the
National Rifle
Assn., she doesn't just support killing animals from helicopters, she
does it herself. She doesn't just talk about increasing the use of
fossil fuels but puts a coal-burning power plant in her own small town.
She doesn't just echo McCain's pledge to criminalize abortion by
overturning
Roe vs. Wade, she says that if one of her daughters were
impregnated by rape or incest, she should bear the child. She not only
opposes reproductive freedom as a human right but implies that it
dictates abortion, without saying that it also protects the right to
have a child.
So far, the major new McCain supporter that Palin has attracted is
James Dobson of
Focus on the Family. Of course, for Dobson, "women are
merely waiting for their husbands to assume leadership," so he may be
voting for Palin's husband.
Being a hope-a-holic, however, I can see two long-term bipartisan gains from this contest.
Republicans may learn they can't appeal to right-wing patriarchs and
most women at the same time. A loss in November could cause the
centrist majority of Republicans to take back their party, which was
the first to support the Equal Rights Amendment and should be the last
to want to invite government into the wombs of women.
And American women, who suffer more because of having two full-time
jobs than from any other single injustice, finally have support on a
national stage from male leaders who know that women can't be equal
outside the home until men are equal in it. Barack Obama and Joe Biden
are campaigning on their belief that men should be, can be and want to
be at home for their children.
This could be huge.
Gloria Steinem is an author, feminist organizer and co-founder of the
Women's Media Center. She supported Hillary Clinton and is now
supporting Barack Obama.
